Failure of the Alliance for Progress

It is very important to know, that the customary landaccepted by Kennedy Administration. Because of the
reforms in countries of Latin America werestated above causes the results of the Alliance were
concentrated on resettlement. They did not getnot radical in the countries of Latin America. The state
involved with the existent social and political structures;of affairs that countries of Latin American faced up till
in its place, more long-established U.S. methods1960s was too complicated to be resolved with help of
towards land redeployment involved foothold of virgin$22.3 billion of international aid. There was no
islands, public statement of the new grounds andconsiderable improvement made after the years of
convey of the native people to the up to that timeimprovement of land rights in Latin America. Among
unoccupied areas. As for the case with the Alliancethe ten countries that have experienced the land
for Progress, the United States directly got involvedreform, five had previously had a records of land
with the societal structure of Latin America, while thereform as well as the one in Mexico from 1917,
power of property-owners and bribery of the statesGuatemala and Bolivia from 1953, Colombia since
were absolutely underestimated with help of the1960s, Venezuela ever since 1954. The practice of
Alliance for Progress. Well-known revolutionary landthese countries displays that land reform of the
rearrangement policies in Cuba and Mexico set theAlliance for Progress for sure was a complete failure.
tendency for every farmland policy in Latin America.Clearly, U.S. foreign policy needed be much more
There in no doubt, that a meaningfully strongeraggressive in counties of Latin America to reach the
impulsion was needed for strategy to be successfullygoals that were earlier established by the Kennedy
implemented more willingly than a "Peaceful Revolution"Administration.