Wilson and Bush Foreign Policy - A Comparative view

((... To see the promotion of American democracyWilson in 1915 targeted Haiti for democratization. Haiti
throughout the world has been always the greatesthad been influenced by U.S since 1905. Some puppet
matter for American foreign policy...)) Nil Levisgovernments had come to power and were rejected
Journalist (New York Times)by coupe. Wilson in 1915 dispatched troops to Haiti to
Although history of U.S throughout twenty century,pacify and suppress Haitians who had rioted against
president have resembled each other but hardly youGuillaum Sam, American surrogate whom people had
may see both of them, though with highly timekilled for revenge of his execution of opponents.
distances, to have similarity in their foreign policy. TheAmericans organized presidential election and even a
presidents whose foreign policy will be studied in thisnew constitution, as they did in Afghanistan after
article are Woodrow Wilson (1913- 1921) and Georgetoppling Taliban regime. Establishing a Luyeh Jergeh, a
W. Bush, both of them tried to show themselves moralkind of elite assembly, Americans organized a
, religious and good Christians, especially Wilson asso-called election to elect president by people and
Presbyterianist. According to historian(Schuel, History ofHamed Karzay was elected as a American surrogate.
U.S, translated by E. Sedghiani,1383,Tehran,Amir KabirAmerican leaders, today, seek for strengthening their
publication)Wilson desired in keeping nations'position in Afghanistan by indicating some issues as
international rights. Bush also believes in helping nationsTaliban's' return, Terrorism and Jeopardized
with rogue states to promote real democracy in thedemocracy in Afghanistan to manipulate public opinion
same way Wilson viewed, "only U.S could lead worldand prepare them for their stay, understand to be
into a new, peaceful era of unobstructed commerce,pressed on by American citizens and international
free market nonexploitative capitalism, democraticcommunity. It will happen in Iraq as well. As George
politics, and open diplomacy...Armament had to beBush called people in America and world that
reduced" .American troops had captured Baghdad and "Iraqi
It is interesting to see, even different parties of whichpeople are now free" (his speech on news), all people
presidents have come out but they have functionedwaiting for Bush's declare end of war and time to go
alike in terms of foreign policy. Wilson who came toout of Iraq, but he noted sometimes directly his idea
office as a democratic nominee and won presidencyabout democratization and reconstruction, or before
in 1913 had a legacy of two powerful terms during T.them finding WMD and Saddam, so his speech
Roosevelt and a relatively weak of W.H. Taft, evenimplicated not to quit Iraq. Like many military missions
though Taft intervened in some Central Americanduring twenty century, in Central America, that lasted
countries for he believed "The interventions providedsome years, war on terror will continue, as Bush noted
America strategic and financial interests as well asin his speech.
convenience for these countries" .Wilson was anWilson and Bush resemble in re-election for presidency.
idealist as well as realist, so he meddled and intervenedWilson in first term showed his reluctance for war and
in Mexico to help promote democracy. Parallel to whatAmericans re-elected him by the idea that "He kept us
Bush intend to do in Iraq and Afghanistan. But what isout of war" in 1916, but they regretted very soon
interesting is that a kind of exceptionalistic view can bebecause in 1917 America entered world war and it
seen in both presidents' view of democracy. Twocost 117000 casualties and 26000 death , so people
presidents believe that only American democracy canbecame exhausted and pessimistic toward war and
solve third world problems. One of similar aspects ofWilson. When Wilson asked people to elect democrats
both presidents' foreign policy is to attract nation'sfor congress, they did against it. Offered his peace
support and attention to indicate multilateralism of theirtreaty with 14 principles in Paris, Wilson could not
actions, e.g. Wilson, to support Mexican revolutionaryplease republican senators and representatives to
leaders, better to say intervention, consulted someratify the treaty in congress.
South American states as Brazil, Argentina and ChileBush profited of saddam's arrest for re-election in
to know their idea, and then supported Carransa2004 presidential election for he had achieved his goal,
against Huerta to empower, though Americansarresting Saddam. Although Kerry could use Bush's
occupied its land later. The basic point is that whydefeat in finding WMD to win the campaign, for it was
Wilson did uniquely in Mexico and did not askBush's main explicit excuse to attack on Iraq, but he did
collaboration of those countries when intervened innot , may be public attention was influenced by
Mexico. This is a critic to him and can be compared toarresting the dictator and Bush's triumphant, so Kerry
what Bush does in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush, althoughunder Jewish lobbies could not benefit Bush's defeat. In
at the break out of War on Terror parted all worldcongress election, November 2006, people of America
two parts, with America or against it, today most ofshocked President Bush and voted for democrats.
states helped U.S fighting in Iraq but only America andWilson entered the first world war for democracy, as
Britain make decision for Iraq and its future, apart fromnoted before, Wilson believed in multilateralism, of
plundering its oil by U.S and Britain, and reconstruction,course, it was due to the time because U.S could not
and no one can see U.N (United Nations) and Securityassume itself without rival, so he planned League of
Council or other states' role in this issue. Of course, theNations and introduced himself and U.S as caller for
reason lays on period of post cold war and the birth ofpeace and freedom. He said "the world must be made
American unilateralism after Soviet Union collapse insafe for democracy. Its peace must be planted upon
the late 1980s, while in first decades of twenty centurythe tested foundations of political liberty"(Tindall,1134).In
the international position was not so easy. At the breakpeace conference, Wilson spoke about "peace
of twenty century superpowers competed politicallywithout victory"(American Age. 294).He does not like
and for land, while they also formed political treaty toto identify the winner, for U.S security and interests
act successfully in world scene.would be jeopardized by winner group in Europe and
In U.S, people and politicians have been introduced toworld. The war, itself, had weakened both sides made
be conservative in different occasion. Refusing enteroccasion for U.S to benefit political and economical
the first world war by Wilson signified it. He wasopportunities. The U.S became a source of funding and
pressed, while he resisted, by some pro-British incredit for Allied countries in Europe.
America to enter the war for being Anglo-AmericanBush came to office after Clinton and from the very
and had same ancestors. Even when Lusitania wasbeginning criticized Clinton's foreign policy in his
attacked to be sunk and 128 Americans among otherspresidential campaign. He claimed that Clinton had
died. He only warned Germans by ending politicalpushed America to isolated policy. Setting a group of
relations and complained for what they did. Aexperts by neo-cons to modify and re-define foreign
competition between America and European powerspolicy for assessing status quo to design more
caused Wilson not favor of each side becauseimportant role for U.S throughout world. The politicians
triumphant of each side would damage U.S security,as Candoliza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz and Donald
power and position in world (Lafeber. Walter, TheRamsfeld and the likes planned attack after 11
American Age, 1994, Norton Company, New York).September and directed Bush toward Middle East.
Bush's and neo-cons' doctrine as first AmericanThey believe in America unilateralism in world and say
government in twenty first century led America tothat U.S should not trust on international organizations
pre-emption war, as some believe they, themselves,about different issues for they aim to weaken U.S.
caused the war broke out. The attack on SeptemberAccording to such an idea, Bush pretends apparently
11 aroused war and was a manipulated tragedy. Ato follow Security Council of U.N on international issues,
tragedy designed to attract Americans and congressbut all witnessed while Security Council inspectors did
to make them supporters of war, the target Bush andnot confirm WMD in Iraq, Bush announced America
Neo-cons wanted to reach. Bush as Wilson has maderight to attack Iraq to find weapons and paid no
democratization and toppling rogue states as a goal inattention to international and domestic opposition. During
world. Ideally he thinks of nation-building in Iraq andits history U.N has not been as weak as it is
Afghanistan and envisions it as his American missionIn general, if some one pays a careful attention to U.S
(Fukuyama, Nation-Building, p. 1), but does nothistory, he will find out, despite of party competition and
understand that "it is state-building rather thanrivalry, all American presidents completed the function
nation-building" (Fukuyama, 3).of others in the past.