Non-Selection Of Angkor Wat Undermines Credibility Of New Seven Wonders Of The World

I am saddened to announce that Angkor Wat did notbeginning because Cambodia has a population of just
make the new "Seven Wonders of the World" as14 million, compared to 522 million in Latin America and
determined by Bernard Weber's online campaign.over a billion each in China and India. Moreover, internet
Just like previous attempts to name the world's sevenaccess is quite limited and expensive in Cambodia. For
wonders, this one is seriously flawed and arbitrary. Theinstance, unlimited broadband access costs almost
new method is based on electronic votes casted$900 a month, not a trivial amount by any standards,
through the internet and cell phone text messages.but an astronomical figure in a country whose per
The New Seven Wonders were announced on July 7,capita income is less than $400 a year. Internet usage
2007 in Lisbon, Portugal at a celebrity-studdedis largely restricted to foreigners and English-speaking
ceremony televised in more than 170 countries to anCambodians at internet cafes charging users hourly
estimated 1.6 billion viewers. The winners are:fees.
* The Great Wall of ChinaDespite Cambodia's small population and highly limited
* India's Taj Mahalinternet access, I figured that Angkor Wat would have
* Jordan's ancient city of Petrano problem making the Seven Wonders list given the
* Incan ruins of Machu Picchu in Perusheer number of Asian tourists who visit Angkor each
* Brazil's Statue of Christ the Redeemeryear. As it turned out, while the world's two most
* Mexico's Chichen Itza pyramidpopulous countries, China and India, each had their sites,
* Italy's Colosseumthe Great Wall and Taj Mahal, respectively, selected,
Of these, only the Great Wall, which stretches overAsians tended not to vote as a unified bloc.
4,000 miles and is the only man-made structure visibleWhile the selection of the "New Seven Wonders" is
from space, clearly belongs on the list.trivial and worthless from a scientific standpoint, the
Since many of the 100 million votes came from Latinhuge sensationalism that surrounds this preposterous
America, it's hardly surprising that Machu Picchu ofundertaking could lead to serious and far-reaching
Peru, Brazil's Statue of Christ the Redeemer, andconsequences. Cambodia, an impoverished country still
Mexico's Chichen Itza made the list.reeling from decades of civil war and genocide, relies
However, it is hard to conceive how any of theseheavily on tourism revenues for its recovery. Apart
sites could top Angkor Wat in a fair and objectivefrom being an insult to Cambodians everywhere, the
selection process. For instance, Brazil's 100-foot Christmarginalization of Angkor could eat away at the
the Redeemer statue is only 75 years old and tookdesperately needed dollars generated by cultural
just 10 years to erect. By contrast, Angkor Wat, thetourism to the country.
largest religious temple in the world, is more than 800Although the United Nations Educational, Scientific and
years old and covers more than 200 acres of ground.Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the world body
The voting allowed one free vote to registeredresponsible for overseeing the restoration of World
members and charged a fee for additional votes. InHeritage sites, has vehemently dismissed the
Brazil, there was a campaign Vote no Cristo (Vote forSwiss-born Bernard Weber project and said it would
the Christ) which had the support of the country'sreflect "only the opinions of those with access to the
telecommunications firms to allow Brazilians to castinternet," the massive fanfare created by the
text message votes at no charge. The "Vote forcampaign could lead to public confusion about who the
Christ" slogan, which can be seen on bumper stickerstrue Seven Wonders of the World are, leading to
throughout North America, seems to call on people todeleterious reallocation of restoration funds from truly
vote on their religious faith rather than the statue'sdeserving sites to less deserving ones.
architectural merits. If you're Christian, I think you'd beIf there is such a thing as the Eighth Wonder of the
hard pressed not to vote for Christ.World, it would not be Angkor Wat, but the mere fact
Previous attempts to name the Seven Wonders hadthat this magnificent monument was not selected
favored Greco-Roman structures. The Greatamong the Seven Wonders. Anyone who has visited
Pyramids of Giza was withdrawn from the voting butAngkor Wat can attest to its grandeur, sublime beauty
was honored anyway as "Honorary Candidate" toand architectural splendor. In fact, Angkor Wat is just
placate the Egyptians' indignation that their site shouldone of the many temples in an archaeological area
be included automatically rather than having to bestretching over some 400 sq. km. The complex,
voted on. As if the vote's credibility isn't alreadycollectively known as "Angkor" (which means "city" in
undermined by its own dubious methodology andKhmer), is home to Angkor Wat, Angkor Thom, the
outcome, there are actually eight wonders on the listBayon Temple, many other magnificent remains of the
of seven, counting the Great Pyramids' specialonce-mighty Khmer Empire which ruled from the 9th to
honorary status.the 15th century. Although Angkor Wat is the largest
Perhaps we Cambodians should demand a similarand most beautiful of them all, Angkor Thom and
special honor for Angkor Wat as well because itBayon could have easily been nominated for the
clearly dwarfs many of the current selections in size,Seven Wonders as well.
splendor and architectural sophistication. After all, ifBut don't take my word for it-- go visit Angkor and
there are already eight "wonders" on the list of seven,judge for yourself whether or not Angkor Wat
what's wrong with having nine, ten, or even twenty?belongs to the World's Seven Wonders list.
I've had some misgivings about the voting from the