How Multinationals Are Managing Communications in Latin America

Ten years ago emerging markets were seen as a- 33% managed communications directly from the
sideshow by multinational companies with resourcescorporate centre - e.g.; New York, Madrid, London-
focused on the developed markets of Westernworking with local PROs and agencies in-country to
Europe and North America. Ten years on andsupport execution;
emerging markets are widely viewed as the engine of- 52% devolved decision making to a regional
organic growth, crucial to sustaining margins.communications head for Central or South America,
As a recent report by the Economist Intelligence Unitreporting to central communications and a dotted-line
and KPMG notes, the promise of emerging marketto the regional business head;
growth is leading to a significant shift in resources and- Only 15% devolved power down to smaller regional
a re-think of corporate structures. There is aclusters or single countries, with almost all of these
consensus that a decade of centralisation has takentreating Brazil as a stand-alone unit;
its toll and what is required now is localisation of- By some margin, Miami was the favoured 'hub' for
decision making, flatter management structures andregional communications with Buenos Aires a
shared resources. The challenge is getting the balancesecondary hub for the Spanish speaking markets and
right.most having senior PRO dedicated to Brazil
"Local markets need to be embedded in a broader- Overall the research showed corporate
regional and global structure that not only keepscommunications to be much more centralised than
administrative costs low by sharing back-office andother business functions, with few respondents
functional resources, but also focuses the attention ofanticipating change in 2010.
senior management, ensures corporate compliance,Perhaps this is inevitable: multinationals recognise the
prioritises markets, channels resources for growth,benefits of a centrally controlled message and wish to
breaks down silos and builds synergies with otherexploit economies of scale, with little obvious downside.
markets." (EUI, 2009)But if this is the case, it is perhaps surprising to see
Europe has seen a gradual shift away from thesuch a diffuse and fragmented agency landscape
London domination of the 'EMEA' region, with someacross the region: consistency of messaging and
multinationals moving to a CEMEA grouping ofeconomies of scale are also arguments for
emerging markets while others decentralise further topan-regional agency support.
regional clusters: Central Europe, South East EuropeThe agency market in Latin America is more
and often Russia as a stand-alone.fragmented than any other region of the world: there
Likewise, we are starting to see a gradual moveare no fully owned and integrated agencies with true
away from US-centric management of the 'Americas'pan-regional coverage, although many of the global
with many multinationals devolving power to Latinnetworks do have "reach" across the region through
American units and increasingly to clusters of Centrallocal affiliates. The underlying reason most of the global
America, the Caribbean, the Andean countries and thenetworks have failed to build a direct presence in the
Southern Cone. Brazil - like Russia - is increasinglyregion is almost certainly down to historic levels of PR
treated as a stand-alone.spend in the region; less than 1% of the global industry
In our recent survey of fifty of the leading multinationalvalue, according to estimates by Paul Holmes.
companies in Central and South America we looked atBut if emerging markets are moving centre stage and
how companies were managing the corporatethe next decade will see increasing focus and
communications in the region: how the region isresources on Latin America it is clear the PR agency
structured and managed; where the region is "hubbed"sector has a job to do in aligning itself with these new
and where decision-making and budgetary power lay.corporate realities.
Of the companies surveyed: