Government Intervention In Housing Market May End Soon

Government Intervention in Housing Market May EndDisappear?"].
SoonThe Federal Reserve Bank has also played an
Based on all measures, the government's role in theimportant role in keeping the market for
housing/mortgage markets has expanded rapidly sincemortgage-backed securities functioning smoothly. The
the onset of the credit crisis in 2008. Visit Here NowFed has purchased at least $800 Billion in such
“In fact, more than 80% of the new residentialsecurities as part of its quantitative easing mission, with
mortgage loans made this year benefited from sometotal purchases to reach as much as $1.45 Trillion next
form of government support, according to the tradeMarch, when the program is slated to come to an end.
publication Inside Mortgage Finance.” ExpertsAgain, it's impossible to understate the impact on
reckon that if the government were to exit, themortgage rates. Since intervention began, the spread
nascent recovery would collapse immediately.between mortgage rates and Treasury rates has
Unfortunately, due to budgetary problems, this isnarrowed by .7%, implying that rates would not be
becoming increasingly likely.toying with record lows if not for the hand of the Fed.
 As the Fed slows down and eventually stops its
Let's begin by examining the governmentpurchases, mortgage rates are expected to rise
“intervention” in greater detail. First, there is thedramatically. [Chart courtesy of WSJ].
government tax credit, which provides up to $8,000 
towards the purchase of a new home, by first-timeLast but not least, there is the Federal Housing
homebuyers. Originally designed as a tax credit, theAdministration (FHA), which has become the major
cash can now be “monetized” and put towardsplayer in the mortgage market. While the housing
a down-payment. It is impossible to understate thebubble was inflating, less than 10% of all loans were
success of this program: “Deutsche Bankbacked by the FHA. Nowadays, that figure is closer to
estimates the credit has helped generate 350,00040%, and for some lenders, as high as 90%. When
sales, about half the increase in single-family homeyou consider that the FHA recently raised its limits, it's
sales in the past six months.”fair to say that obtaining a mortgage would be much
Unfortunately, many analysts are skeptical that thesemore difficult otherwise.
sales were facilitated by the tax credit. Rather, theThe FHA has also been among extremely aggressive
assumption is that buyers who would have enteredin executing loan modifications, in contrast to private
the market in the next couple years anyway, simplylenders, which continue to drag their feet. Under the
moved their plans forward to take advantage of bothterms of the FHA program, borrowers are only
the credit and weak prices. It stands to reason, then,required to pay interest on 2/3 of the outstanding
that if the program expires in November (asprincipal balance. The remaining portion of debt is not
scheduled), that demand could plummet, and homeforgiven, but must be repaid only in the event of a sale
prices could once again sink.or refinancing.
Then, there is the government takeover of FannieRegardless of whether this saves the organization
Mae and Freddie Mac. Both companies are basicallymoney – as it alleges – it still results in a net loss
insolvent, and if not for the injection of $200 Billionon every mortgage that it insures. Given also that a
funded with taxpayer money, it's safe to say that thehigher proportion of FHA loans are delinquent (when
market for mortgage securities wouldn't be functioning.compared to uninsured loans), it's inevitable that its role
At some point, the government will have to come upin the housing/mortgage market will soon decline. Its
with a viable long-term alternative to the currentreserves have already fallen to the lowest level in 75
situation, the implications of which are still unknown.years, and the government has announced that drastic
[See related post: "Could Fannie and Freddiemeasures will be required if a bailout is to be averted.