Flower Sour - Cupid, Chemicals, And Corporate Social Responsibility

A few days ago I had one of those "random"The ongoing side effects from the continued use of
conversations that sets the brain blazing down asuch chemicals in Colombian and Ecuadorian floral
hundred different paths almost immediately. The topicworkers - headaches, nausea, impaired vision, asthma,
was DDT, and how that chemical was bought andstillbirths, congenital malformations, miscarriages - are
sold with impunity in Latin America years after it hadgraphic and constant reminders of the blatant
been banned in the United States for causing serioussociopolitical and economic double standards at play in
health and environmental problems.our current global dynamic.
In the beginning it was the wonder chemical of yore.Sneaky history. It's almost impressive the way it keeps
From getting rid of vermin, to use as an agriculturalrecycling itself. Well, at least we can't call it
pesticide, to eliminating malaria, the new potionunsustainable.
apparently knew no bounds. Soon however, nasty littleColumbia is the second largest flower producer in the
pieces of evidence - cancer, birth defects, andworld. Two-thirds of all fresh cut flowers sold in the
environmental hazards - started to spring up againstUnited States come from Columbia. Dole, the leading
the wonder chemical. Consequently, during the 1970sproducer of fresh fruit and vegetables, is also one of
and 1980s, agricultural use of DDT was banned in thethe largest flower producers in Latin America.
US and most developed countries.Dole's official CSR report reads like a dream. That is,
However, it would seem this urgent health anduntil you consider the fact that Columbian and
environmental update somehow bypassed LatinEcuadorian floral workers, many of them women, are
America and some other parts of the world. Inexposed daily, to some of the most toxic chemicals
countries like Ecuador and Colombia, DDT and similaravailable. Or unavailable - about a fifth of these
derivatives remain in active use especially forchemicals used in the greenhouses are either banned,
agricultural purposes. All this despite the 2001or not registered for use in the US or Canada for
Stockholm Convention calling for the elimination of suchvarious health reasons. Dole has agreed to participate
"persistent organic pollutants" in agribusiness.in an environmental standards program, but the
DDT and other such persistent pollutants are just that -question is whether the affected governments have
persistent. In human and other animal life, they cluster inany real monitoring systems in place.
fatty areas and proceed, nonstop, to erode theThe promotion of agribusiness should not come at the
system from within. And this is just the proverbial tip.cost of human health, environment, or wildlife survival.
Marketing and selling chemicals in developing countries,This should be the business bottom line. However,
where public awareness of negative effects may belooking at the plight of flower workers in Columbia and
lower, is irresponsible, to say the least. And obviouslyEcuador, this common sense goal starts to look more
certain businesses thrive by courting governments thatlike a foolish dream.
are either more susceptible to manipulation or prone toIs a rose just a rose anymore? I would argue with the
allowing the unchecked commercialization of suchbard. It would seem that its thorns are more the norm
hazardous products.in certain parts of our world.