Economic Development in Latin America

Economic development in Latin America has been asuch as inflation, poor quality goods at exorbitant
matter of great debate since they becameprices, and agricultural societies suffering due to the
independent. In the nineteenth century, Europe and thegovernment subsidizing industries and not them. The
United States thought the reason why there was aCuban revolution caused many Latin American
lack of development among Latin American countriescountries to consider their own communist revolution,
was because they were racially inferior and Catholic. Inwhich instigated President John Kennedy to put phase
the twentieth century, the reasons advanced was thatthree into motion.
they are backwards and uneducated. Latin AmericanModernization theorists persuaded Kennedy to help
countries assert their lack of development is notmodernize Latin America in the belief that if they did
because of the theories that first world countries putso, the Latin American countries would commit them to
forth, but rather due to the fact that those samecapitalism and democracy, and not become
countries have stolen much of their mineral wealth andcommunistic. Promoting health care and education was
agricultural products during the colonial period. Sincemost important to President Kennedy because Castro
their independence, Latin American countries havewas very successful in implementing these two
went through four phases of economic development.reforms in Cuba. The plan implemented in Latin
Between 1821 and 1880, the first phase consisted ofAmerica was very similar to the Marshall Plan, which
classic liberalism. This type of economy consisted ofhad been used for European countries after World
free trade, and opening the country to foreignWar II. The downfall to this phase was that in Latin
investment. Many of the Latin American countriesAmerica they were not re-creating democracy, but
produced a mono-crop economy, which made themrather creating it which was much more difficult.
very vulnerable to fluctuations in foreign markets.By 1968 this phase was failing and revolutions broke
Classic liberalism did create some economic growth inout again. From 1982 to the present, there has been a
the form of railroads, telegraphs, port works, andreturn to nineteenth century liberalism, called
financial institutions. However this type of growthneo-liberalism. This economic policy includes open
benefited the wealthy only; it did nothing for the lowermarkets, foreign investors, and globalism, such as
classes. As a result of this economic instability, revoltsNAFTA. This is similar in many respects to the policies
occurred among Latin American countries.existing in the creation of the European Union, but does
The second phase of economic development wasnot include open borders between the United States
import substitution industrialization (ISI). Foreign capitalistsand Mexico. The probable reason for keeping the
were driven out of the countries. For example, Mexicoborders closed is that illegal immigrants will work for
nationalized oil and railroads, thereby forcing outsubstantially less than they would if the borders were
Standard Oil and Andrew Carnegie. Latin Americanopen. Foreign investment in Latin American countries
countries closed their borders and instituted laws thatalso benefit the capitalists much more than the people
foreigners could not own the majority interest inof the countries themselves because the capitalists do
businesses. The government began subsidizing Latinnot have the same requirements to provide job
American businesses, but this plan did not lead tobenefits to those workers that they would have in the
economic prosperity. By 1959, the countries hadUnited States, such as workman's compensation,
minimal development and bad economic problems,health insurance, and minimum wage standards.